Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 3.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
2 months newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra