Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is $0.69 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
2 months newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together