Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 17.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (84.5%), ARC-C (83.4%), API-Bank (82.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together