Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 21.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
8 months newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together