Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 1.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
5 days newer

Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Mistral NeMo Instruct
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together

Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI