+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 15.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
7 months newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:55.2%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:70.4%(+15.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2047 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 118 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 292 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:55.2%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:70.4%(+15.3%)
Providers:0