+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 21.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
9 months newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:30.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%(+21.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2047 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 118 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 292 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:30.4%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%(+21.6%)
Providers:0