+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:67.9%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Cerebras
Throughput: 2047 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 118 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 292 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Groq
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:9
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:67.9%(+7.1%)
Providers:0