+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 4.0% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 days newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:33.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:37.9%(+4.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:33.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:37.9%(+4.0%)
Providers:1