Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 7.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 days newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together