+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 1.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:39.3%(+1.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:37.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:39.3%(+1.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:37.8%
Providers:9