+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 82.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
5 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:9.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:91.7%(+82.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:9.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:91.7%(+82.7%)
Providers:0