+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 18.7% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:41.5%(+18.7%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:22.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:41.5%(+18.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:22.8%
Providers:0