+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base leads with 4.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
4 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:80.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:84.3%(+4.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:80.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:84.3%(+4.0%)
Providers:0