+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 8.6% higher average benchmark score. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:85.8%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:94.5%(+8.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:85.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:94.5%(+8.6%)
Providers:2