+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 35.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:20.7%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:56.5%(+35.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:20.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:56.5%(+35.7%)
Providers:0