+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.3% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ScienceQA (91.3%), POPE (86.1%), MMBench (81.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:37.3%(+6.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:30.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:37.3%(+6.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:30.7%
Providers:0