+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:32.5%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:37.3%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:32.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:37.3%(+4.9%)
Providers:1