+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:38.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:55.3%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:55.3%(+16.4%)
Providers:9