+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 7.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
3 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:65.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:73.3%(+7.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:65.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:73.3%(+7.6%)
Providers:9