+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 14.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.6%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:65.5%(+14.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:65.5%(+14.9%)
Providers:0