+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:36.1%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:29.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:36.1%(+6.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:29.3%
Providers:0