+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:69.3%(+17.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:52.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:69.3%(+17.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:52.0%
Providers:0