+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 16.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
1 days newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:54.1%(+16.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:37.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:54.1%(+16.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:37.5%
Providers:1