+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 9.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
1 days newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:69.3%(+9.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:60.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:69.3%(+9.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:60.3%
Providers:0