+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:28.1%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:47.7%(+19.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:28.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:47.7%(+19.6%)
Providers:1