+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 17.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning Plus was created as an enhanced reasoning variant, designed to provide even deeper analytical capabilities within the Phi-4 family. Built to maximize reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of small models, it represents the most capable reasoning-focused option in the Phi-4 series.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:60.2%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Average Score:77.3%(+17.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:60.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Avg Score:77.3%(+17.1%)
Providers:0