+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:69.3%(+5.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:63.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:69.3%(+5.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:63.7%
Providers:0