+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 36.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:22.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:58.1%(+36.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:22.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:58.1%(+36.2%)
Providers:0