+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:47.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:72.9%(+25.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:47.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:72.9%(+25.8%)
Providers:3