+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:26.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+19.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:26.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+19.9%)
Providers:1