+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 leads with 26.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
2 days newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:71.2%(+26.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:45.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:71.2%(+26.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:45.0%
Providers:6