+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:36.6%(+5.1%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:31.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:36.6%(+5.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:31.5%
Providers:0