+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 38.8% higher average benchmark score. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:18.3%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:57.1%(+38.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:18.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:57.1%(+38.8%)
Providers:1