+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 43.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:13.2%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:56.5%(+43.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:13.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:56.5%(+43.2%)
Providers:0