+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 27.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
23 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:36.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:63.6%(+27.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:36.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:63.6%(+27.0%)
Providers:0