+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 42.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.9% across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (96.4%), Android Control Low_EM (93.7%), ChartQA (89.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:13.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:55.8%(+42.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:13.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:55.8%(+42.5%)
Providers:0