+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 13.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
22 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 13 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:36.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:49.9%(+13.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:36.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:49.9%(+13.3%)
Providers:3