Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
Launched on the same date

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Together

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra