Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 19.5% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
2 months newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Together

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together