Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 4 Scout
Together
Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together