Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
6 months newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout
Together

Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together