+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 35.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:68.2%(+35.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 108 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 125 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Groq
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Sambanova
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:68.2%(+35.4%)
Providers:0