+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 46.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
2 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+46.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 108 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 125 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Groq
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Sambanova
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+46.2%)
Providers:0