+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
6 days newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:52.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:68.4%(+15.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
DeepInfra
Throughput: 108 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 125 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Groq
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Sambanova
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:52.6%
Providers:6
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:68.4%(+15.8%)
Providers:0