+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 13.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.6%), MT-Bench (91.7%), MBPP (91.3%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:41.7%(+13.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:28.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:41.7%(+13.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:28.3%
Providers:0