+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 25.9% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 6 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (73.6%), GPQA (70.8%), AIME 2025 (64.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:41.7%(+25.9%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:15.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:41.7%(+25.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:15.8%
Providers:0