+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 38.0% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+38.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+38.0%)
Providers:0