+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 32.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.2% across 4 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (70.7%), GPQA (68.2%), AIME 2025 (62.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:46.3%(+32.3%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:14.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:46.3%(+32.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:14.1%
Providers:0