+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 19.3% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:37.9%(+19.3%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:18.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:37.9%(+19.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:18.6%
Providers:0