+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Large 2 leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $7.97 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Mistral Large 2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
2 months newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($7.97 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:70.5%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:88.5%(+18.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:70.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:88.5%(+18.0%)
Providers:2