+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (80.6%), TriviaQA (80.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:39.7%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:27.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:39.7%(+12.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:27.4%
Providers:0