+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 15.8% higher average benchmark score. Nova Lite offers 46.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
1 month newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.27 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:63.0%
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:78.7%(+15.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:63.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:78.7%(+15.8%)
Providers:1