+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 29.9% higher average benchmark score. Nova Lite offers 46.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Nova Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Amazon. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.7% across 27 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.5%), ARC-C (92.4%), DocVQA (92.4%). It supports a 302K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Amazon's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($0.27 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:23.2%
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:53.0%(+29.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 171.5 tok/s
Latency: 0.24ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:23.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:53.0%(+29.9%)
Providers:1